<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1696 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307680</link>
    <description>Vague and unparticularised allegations of fraud, coercion or undue influence were held insufficient to displace a voluntary separation scheme accepted and acted upon by workmen. The Court noted that the pleadings under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 lacked the necessary particulars, while the evidence was inconsistent with the pleaded case and supported voluntary acceptance of the scheme. It also reaffirmed that certiorari under Articles 226 and 227 is supervisory, but interference is justified where an award is perverse, based on no evidence, or ignores material evidence. On the stated facts, the Labour Court&#039;s award was vulnerable to interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:10:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1696 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307680</link>
      <description>Vague and unparticularised allegations of fraud, coercion or undue influence were held insufficient to displace a voluntary separation scheme accepted and acted upon by workmen. The Court noted that the pleadings under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 lacked the necessary particulars, while the evidence was inconsistent with the pleaded case and supported voluntary acceptance of the scheme. It also reaffirmed that certiorari under Articles 226 and 227 is supervisory, but interference is justified where an award is perverse, based on no evidence, or ignores material evidence. On the stated facts, the Labour Court&#039;s award was vulnerable to interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>