https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307669 A disciplinary finding of exam personation was quashed where the only material was a bare visual handwriting comparison, unsupported by expert, microscopic, or corroborative evidence. The Court held that the no-evidence rule applies where relied-on material lacks probative value and cannot rationally sustain the conclusion, and that the finding was perverse and contrary to natural justice. It also held that academic punishment must be reasonable and proportionate; the five-year debarment was grossly excessive and arbitrary, so interference in writ jurisdiction was justified. The examination result was to be declared and the student permitted to attend classes on that basis. en-us Fri, 23 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:10:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307669 A disciplinary finding of exam personation was quashed where the only material was a bare visual handwriting comparison, unsupported by expert, microscopic, or corroborative evidence. The Court held that the no-evidence rule applies where relied-on material lacks probative value and cannot rationally sustain the conclusion, and that the finding was perverse and contrary to natural justice. It also held that academic punishment must be reasonable and proportionate; the five-year debarment was grossly excessive and arbitrary, so interference in writ jurisdiction was justified. The examination result was to be declared and the student permitted to attend classes on that basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307669