<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1173 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437147</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year is valid only where income escaped assessment because the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts in the original scrutiny assessment under section 143(3). Here, the assessee had already furnished the return, audited accounts, computation, bank details and loan details during the original proceedings, and the reopening relied on the same material already examined. A reference to a search in another group did not supply fresh material showing nondisclosure. The statutory conditions for reopening beyond four years were not met, so the reassessment was held invalid in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:41:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1173 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437147</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year is valid only where income escaped assessment because the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts in the original scrutiny assessment under section 143(3). Here, the assessee had already furnished the return, audited accounts, computation, bank details and loan details during the original proceedings, and the reopening relied on the same material already examined. A reference to a search in another group did not supply fresh material showing nondisclosure. The statutory conditions for reopening beyond four years were not met, so the reassessment was held invalid in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>