<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1165 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437139</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) in allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal confirmed that the incentive payments were not subject to TDS under section 194H as they were turnover discounts and the retailers did not act as agents of the assessee. Therefore, the grounds taken by the revenue were dismissed, and the appeal of the revenue was ultimately dismissed on 31.03.2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1165 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437139</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) in allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal confirmed that the incentive payments were not subject to TDS under section 194H as they were turnover discounts and the retailers did not act as agents of the assessee. Therefore, the grounds taken by the revenue were dismissed, and the appeal of the revenue was ultimately dismissed on 31.03.2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>