<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1159 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty should not have been imposed as the additions were based on estimation, and part relief was granted by the Appellate Authority. The Tribunal relied on a precedent cited by the assessee&#039;s counsel in reaching this decision. Consequently, the appeal was successful, and the penalty was removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:40:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1159 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty should not have been imposed as the additions were based on estimation, and part relief was granted by the Appellate Authority. The Tribunal relied on a precedent cited by the assessee&#039;s counsel in reaching this decision. Consequently, the appeal was successful, and the penalty was removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>