<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1151 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437125</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of customs duty exemption to hospitals supplying imported medical equipment turns on factual compliance with notification conditions; the exemption was granted in public interest subject to conditions requiring at least 40% of outdoor patients to receive free treatment and at least 10% of beds reserved for low-income inpatients. The competent authority assessed post-import compliance and found free treatment provided at remote camps, not at the hospitals where exempted equipment is installed; therefore the hospitals failed the continuing onus to prove reservation of beds and 40% outpatient free treatment at the installation site, resulting in valid cancellation of Customs Duty Exemption Certificates as contrary to the exemptions purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1151 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437125</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of customs duty exemption to hospitals supplying imported medical equipment turns on factual compliance with notification conditions; the exemption was granted in public interest subject to conditions requiring at least 40% of outdoor patients to receive free treatment and at least 10% of beds reserved for low-income inpatients. The competent authority assessed post-import compliance and found free treatment provided at remote camps, not at the hospitals where exempted equipment is installed; therefore the hospitals failed the continuing onus to prove reservation of beds and 40% outpatient free treatment at the installation site, resulting in valid cancellation of Customs Duty Exemption Certificates as contrary to the exemptions purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>