https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437110 The court held that the writ petition challenging an order under Section 16 of FEMA was not maintainable as the petitioners had an alternative remedy under Section 19 of FEMA. It was found that pending proceedings under the omitted provision, Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA, were saved by Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, allowing Respondent No. 1 to have jurisdiction to pass the impugned order. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, directing the petitioners to pursue their alternative remedy under Section 19 of FEMA, and closing any pending miscellaneous petitions in the writ petition. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437110 The court held that the writ petition challenging an order under Section 16 of FEMA was not maintainable as the petitioners had an alternative remedy under Section 19 of FEMA. It was found that pending proceedings under the omitted provision, Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA, were saved by Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, allowing Respondent No. 1 to have jurisdiction to pass the impugned order. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, directing the petitioners to pursue their alternative remedy under Section 19 of FEMA, and closing any pending miscellaneous petitions in the writ petition. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437110