<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1790 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to allow the appeal of the assessee and restore the order of the Ld. AO dated 30/3/2015. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) as the Tribunal had quashed the order of the Pr. CIT under section 263 of the Act. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, as the order passed by the Ld. AO under section 143(3) read with section 263 did not survive in this situation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 21:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1790 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to allow the appeal of the assessee and restore the order of the Ld. AO dated 30/3/2015. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) as the Tribunal had quashed the order of the Pr. CIT under section 263 of the Act. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, as the order passed by the Ld. AO under section 143(3) read with section 263 did not survive in this situation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>