<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects 470-Day Delay Petition Due to Lack of Sufficient Explanation; Upholds Previous Delhi High Court Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69461</link>
    <description>Seeking condonation of delay of 470 days in filing the review petition - The issue was decided against the revenue [2018 (10) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - It is well-settled that each day of the delay is required to be explained. In the present case, the delay is substantial and no particulars to explain the delay have been provided. - The application is dismissed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:30:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:30:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects 470-Day Delay Petition Due to Lack of Sufficient Explanation; Upholds Previous Delhi High Court Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69461</link>
      <description>Seeking condonation of delay of 470 days in filing the review petition - The issue was decided against the revenue [2018 (10) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - It is well-settled that each day of the delay is required to be explained. In the present case, the delay is substantial and no particulars to explain the delay have been provided. - The application is dismissed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:30:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>