<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1084 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437058</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s review petition challenging the order dismissing their initial petition for non-compliance with Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding a previous Supreme Court decision and the respondent&#039;s reliance on the mandatory nature of Section 129-E, the Court upheld the original order. The Court emphasized the removal of discretion in scaling down pre-deposits under the new regime, maintaining the deposit amount at 7.5% capped at Rs. 10 Crores. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, with the Court finding no error in the previous order and concluding that the petitioner&#039;s case lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1084 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437058</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s review petition challenging the order dismissing their initial petition for non-compliance with Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding a previous Supreme Court decision and the respondent&#039;s reliance on the mandatory nature of Section 129-E, the Court upheld the original order. The Court emphasized the removal of discretion in scaling down pre-deposits under the new regime, maintaining the deposit amount at 7.5% capped at Rs. 10 Crores. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, with the Court finding no error in the previous order and concluding that the petitioner&#039;s case lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>