<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32549</link>
    <description>The Court found the actions of the customs authorities in seizing consignments of optic fibre cables to be unjustified and held that the collection of a differential duty amount from the petitioners was also unjustified. The Court upheld the petitioners&#039; classification of the cables under a specific tariff heading and emphasized that the payment made by the petitioners was not voluntary but coerced. The Court asserted its jurisdiction in deciding the classification dispute and ordered the authorities to issue show cause notices for reassessment, refund the collected amount with interest, and pay costs to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32549</link>
      <description>The Court found the actions of the customs authorities in seizing consignments of optic fibre cables to be unjustified and held that the collection of a differential duty amount from the petitioners was also unjustified. The Court upheld the petitioners&#039; classification of the cables under a specific tariff heading and emphasized that the payment made by the petitioners was not voluntary but coerced. The Court asserted its jurisdiction in deciding the classification dispute and ordered the authorities to issue show cause notices for reassessment, refund the collected amount with interest, and pay costs to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>