https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437039 Limitation for execution under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 runs from the date a decree first becomes enforceable, not necessarily from the date of the decree itself. Where a compromise decree makes entitlement contingent on a future event, execution cannot begin until that contingency occurs. Here, the decree-holders' right depended on dispossession and related rights being finally determined, which occurred when the civil court passed the final decree on 31.03.1994. The execution application filed on 17.07.1995 was therefore within the 12-year period, and the appeal failed. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437039 Limitation for execution under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 runs from the date a decree first becomes enforceable, not necessarily from the date of the decree itself. Where a compromise decree makes entitlement contingent on a future event, execution cannot begin until that contingency occurs. Here, the decree-holders' right depended on dispossession and related rights being finally determined, which occurred when the civil court passed the final decree on 31.03.1994. The execution application filed on 17.07.1995 was therefore within the 12-year period, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437039