https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307644 The Competition Commission identified prima facie evidence of contraventions by the Opposing Party (OP) under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The OP, a dominant entity in the scooter market, allegedly imposed anti-competitive conditions, including tie-in arrangements, resale price maintenance, and territorial restrictions. These practices potentially abused its market position, limiting competition and dealer autonomy. Consequently, the Commission directed the Director General to conduct an independent investigation within 60 days to substantiate these allegations. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:53:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307644 The Competition Commission identified prima facie evidence of contraventions by the Opposing Party (OP) under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The OP, a dominant entity in the scooter market, allegedly imposed anti-competitive conditions, including tie-in arrangements, resale price maintenance, and territorial restrictions. These practices potentially abused its market position, limiting competition and dealer autonomy. Consequently, the Commission directed the Director General to conduct an independent investigation within 60 days to substantiate these allegations. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307644