https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307641 A statutory leave-and-licence agreement was treated as conclusive proof of the parties' relationship, so post-expiry acceptance of compensation and absence of an immediate notice to vacate did not by themselves create a tenancy or establish waiver; the eviction order was therefore upheld. Damages for continued occupation, however, had to be confined to the proved period and statutory purpose, so the higher award for an anterior period was modified. The damages component was also limited to the suit premises, not additional claims for furniture and fixtures, and amounts already paid or deposited were directed to be adjusted, leaving the separate furniture-and-fixtures claim open. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:55:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307641 A statutory leave-and-licence agreement was treated as conclusive proof of the parties' relationship, so post-expiry acceptance of compensation and absence of an immediate notice to vacate did not by themselves create a tenancy or establish waiver; the eviction order was therefore upheld. Damages for continued occupation, however, had to be confined to the proved period and statutory purpose, so the higher award for an anterior period was modified. The damages component was also limited to the suit premises, not additional claims for furniture and fixtures, and amounts already paid or deposited were directed to be adjusted, leaving the separate furniture-and-fixtures claim open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307641