<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 851 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307640</link>
    <description>Article 136 of the Limitation Act provides a twelve-year period for execution of a civil court decree, running from the date the decree becomes enforceable. Where a decree for possession is contingent on execution and registration of a sale deed, the decree does not become enforceable until that condition is satisfied. Successive execution applications filed within the statutory period cannot be rejected on a technical reading that would defeat the decree-holder&#039;s right to obtain the fruits of the decree. On the stated facts, the sale deed was executed in 1984 and the possession application was filed in 1994, so the execution application was within limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 851 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307640</link>
      <description>Article 136 of the Limitation Act provides a twelve-year period for execution of a civil court decree, running from the date the decree becomes enforceable. Where a decree for possession is contingent on execution and registration of a sale deed, the decree does not become enforceable until that condition is satisfied. Successive execution applications filed within the statutory period cannot be rejected on a technical reading that would defeat the decree-holder&#039;s right to obtain the fruits of the decree. On the stated facts, the sale deed was executed in 1984 and the possession application was filed in 1994, so the execution application was within limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>