<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 282 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32545</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh computation based on recent legal interpretations regarding Section 80 HHC (3) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The Court emphasized the necessity of factual findings on whether sales through export houses were supported by a disclaimer certificate. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 282 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32545</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh computation based on recent legal interpretations regarding Section 80 HHC (3) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The Court emphasized the necessity of factual findings on whether sales through export houses were supported by a disclaimer certificate. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>