<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1060 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437034</link>
    <description>HC ruled that a cosigner/consignee can challenge a GST Act Section 129(3) goods confiscation order by presenting ownership documents, even if the original order was addressed to the driver. The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to pursue appeal mechanisms through appropriate legal channels while preserving rights to contest the order&#039;s substantive aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1060 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437034</link>
      <description>HC ruled that a cosigner/consignee can challenge a GST Act Section 129(3) goods confiscation order by presenting ownership documents, even if the original order was addressed to the driver. The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to pursue appeal mechanisms through appropriate legal channels while preserving rights to contest the order&#039;s substantive aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>