<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1055 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed assessments for the years 2005-06 to 2010-11 and 2011-12 due to the absence of a valid satisfaction note under Section 153C, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of satisfaction recording by the AO. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, supported by precedents from the Delhi HC and SC, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that assessment years should align with the document handover date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1055 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed assessments for the years 2005-06 to 2010-11 and 2011-12 due to the absence of a valid satisfaction note under Section 153C, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of satisfaction recording by the AO. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, supported by precedents from the Delhi HC and SC, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that assessment years should align with the document handover date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>