<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1037 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437011</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondent to unfreeze the petitioner&#039;s savings account and disburse the amount of Rs. 10,73,343.51 to the petitioner. The petitioner successfully argued that the funds in the account were proceeds from his life insurance policy and not jointly owned with his wife, the business proprietor. The Court allowed the petitioner to further establish ownership of the funds for consideration within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1037 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437011</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondent to unfreeze the petitioner&#039;s savings account and disburse the amount of Rs. 10,73,343.51 to the petitioner. The petitioner successfully argued that the funds in the account were proceeds from his life insurance policy and not jointly owned with his wife, the business proprietor. The Court allowed the petitioner to further establish ownership of the funds for consideration within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>