https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437010 The Court declined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction due to disputed facts requiring adjudication. The Petitioner was granted the opportunity to respond to the show cause notice and present their case. The Petitioner's request for the release of a portion of the goods upon depositing 7.5% of their value was accepted. The Court directed the authority to consider this deposit as per law and agreed to the Petitioner's plea for expeditious disposal of proceedings post the show cause notice. A final order is to be passed within four weeks, subject to the Petitioner filing a reply within one week. The Writ Petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437010 The Court declined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction due to disputed facts requiring adjudication. The Petitioner was granted the opportunity to respond to the show cause notice and present their case. The Petitioner's request for the release of a portion of the goods upon depositing 7.5% of their value was accepted. The Court directed the authority to consider this deposit as per law and agreed to the Petitioner's plea for expeditious disposal of proceedings post the show cause notice. A final order is to be passed within four weeks, subject to the Petitioner filing a reply within one week. The Writ Petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437010