<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1027 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437001</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered whether a Section 7 application could be admitted ex parte after the Corporate Debtor had earlier appeared and been given time to file a reply. It distinguished the precedent relied on by the appellant because, unlike that case, an opportunity had already been granted. However, as the order was passed ex parte and the Corporate Debtor&#039;s grievances and later facts on the loan transaction were not placed before the Adjudicating Authority, the Tribunal found it appropriate, in the interests of justice, to allow one further opportunity to file a reply on costs and have the matter heard afresh. The ex parte admission order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1027 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437001</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered whether a Section 7 application could be admitted ex parte after the Corporate Debtor had earlier appeared and been given time to file a reply. It distinguished the precedent relied on by the appellant because, unlike that case, an opportunity had already been granted. However, as the order was passed ex parte and the Corporate Debtor&#039;s grievances and later facts on the loan transaction were not placed before the Adjudicating Authority, the Tribunal found it appropriate, in the interests of justice, to allow one further opportunity to file a reply on costs and have the matter heard afresh. The ex parte admission order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>