https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437000 Consent under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act was treated as executive permission for CBI investigation, not a sanction requiring a detailed speaking order or recorded reasons; the challenge on that ground failed. The court also held that the earlier writ decision on the same consent order had attained finality and operated as res judicata against a later challenge on the identical issue, even though the present petitioner had not been a party to the earlier proceedings. The writ petition therefore failed on both principal issues, and the consent for CBI investigation was sustained. en-us Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437000 Consent under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act was treated as executive permission for CBI investigation, not a sanction requiring a detailed speaking order or recorded reasons; the challenge on that ground failed. The court also held that the earlier writ decision on the same consent order had attained finality and operated as res judicata against a later challenge on the identical issue, even though the present petitioner had not been a party to the earlier proceedings. The writ petition therefore failed on both principal issues, and the consent for CBI investigation was sustained. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437000