https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436992 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the 75% abatement from taxable value under Notification No. 01/2006-ST despite initially availing and later reversing the CENVAT Credit. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous judgments supporting the allowance of the benefit in such cases. The order-in-appeal denying the abatement was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:09:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436992 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the 75% abatement from taxable value under Notification No. 01/2006-ST despite initially availing and later reversing the CENVAT Credit. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous judgments supporting the allowance of the benefit in such cases. The order-in-appeal denying the abatement was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436992