https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32537 The Tribunal ruled in the case involving demands under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 due to the failure to maintain separate accounts for common inputs. The appeals of M/s. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. and M/s. Mount Mettur Pharmaceuticals Ltd. against demands for exempted final products were considered. The Tribunal set aside the demand against M/s. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd., remanding the case for further examination. For M/s. Mount Mettur Pharmaceuticals Ltd., payment of interest on reversed credit was ordered, leading to the setting aside of the demand and penalty. en-us Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32537 The Tribunal ruled in the case involving demands under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 due to the failure to maintain separate accounts for common inputs. The appeals of M/s. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. and M/s. Mount Mettur Pharmaceuticals Ltd. against demands for exempted final products were considered. The Tribunal set aside the demand against M/s. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd., remanding the case for further examination. For M/s. Mount Mettur Pharmaceuticals Ltd., payment of interest on reversed credit was ordered, leading to the setting aside of the demand and penalty. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32537