https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307629 State consent for CBI further investigation under the DSPE Act is an independent executive power, and the order permitting further investigation was upheld because it did not authorise a de novo probe. The Court found no prejudice or miscarriage of justice warranting interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC, particularly as supplementary charge sheets had been filed and cognizance had already been taken by the competent court. It also held that further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC could continue in the peculiar facts despite the interim order of the Supreme Court, and that an accused has no right to choose the investigating agency or block continued investigation merely because the trial has progressed. en-us Sat, 16 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2023 22:12:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307629 State consent for CBI further investigation under the DSPE Act is an independent executive power, and the order permitting further investigation was upheld because it did not authorise a de novo probe. The Court found no prejudice or miscarriage of justice warranting interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC, particularly as supplementary charge sheets had been filed and cognizance had already been taken by the competent court. It also held that further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC could continue in the peculiar facts despite the interim order of the Supreme Court, and that an accused has no right to choose the investigating agency or block continued investigation merely because the trial has progressed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 16 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307629