<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 104 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s demand for service tax of over Rs. 5.8 crores from the appellants for the period 2002-&#039;03 to 2006-&#039;07, including penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants contested the demand on merits and limitation, arguing against the tax liability on &#039;CHA service&#039; and &#039;Business Auxiliary Services (BAS)&#039;. The Tribunal directed a pre-deposit of Rs. 40 lakhs for the demand under &#039;BAS&#039; for the normal period and found no prima facie case against the demand of service tax under &#039;BAS&#039;. Compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was mandated by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 104 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s demand for service tax of over Rs. 5.8 crores from the appellants for the period 2002-&#039;03 to 2006-&#039;07, including penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants contested the demand on merits and limitation, arguing against the tax liability on &#039;CHA service&#039; and &#039;Business Auxiliary Services (BAS)&#039;. The Tribunal directed a pre-deposit of Rs. 40 lakhs for the demand under &#039;BAS&#039; for the normal period and found no prima facie case against the demand of service tax under &#039;BAS&#039;. Compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was mandated by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>