https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307612 A signed revisional judgment cannot be reopened through a later revision that, in substance, seeks review, because a High Court lacks power to alter an earlier final order absent statutory authority. The later revision was therefore not maintainable. The Supreme Court also declined to interfere under special leave jurisdiction with the order directing exclusion of statements recorded under inducement, threat or promise and remitting the matter for fresh consideration, as the order applied the rule that inadmissible material cannot found charges. The High Court's direction to reconsider the matter after excluding such material was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:00:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307612 A signed revisional judgment cannot be reopened through a later revision that, in substance, seeks review, because a High Court lacks power to alter an earlier final order absent statutory authority. The later revision was therefore not maintainable. The Supreme Court also declined to interfere under special leave jurisdiction with the order directing exclusion of statements recorded under inducement, threat or promise and remitting the matter for fresh consideration, as the order applied the rule that inadmissible material cannot found charges. The High Court's direction to reconsider the matter after excluding such material was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307612