<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Spousal Property Purchases Not Automatically Benami Transactions Due to Insufficient Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69408</link>
    <description>Benami Transaction or not - properties purchased by the father in the name of mother - he person in whose name stamp papers were purchased, more so when they are spouses, can never be considered as a strong piece of evidence to compel an inference conclusively the intent behind a purchase. This Court considers that it is far too inadequate to prove benami. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:07:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Spousal Property Purchases Not Automatically Benami Transactions Due to Insufficient Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69408</link>
      <description>Benami Transaction or not - properties purchased by the father in the name of mother - he person in whose name stamp papers were purchased, more so when they are spouses, can never be considered as a strong piece of evidence to compel an inference conclusively the intent behind a purchase. This Court considers that it is far too inadequate to prove benami. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Direct Taxes</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:07:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>