https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32532 The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Ravi Paints & Chemicals Limited (RPCL) in a case concerning service tax for 'Consulting Engineer' services. The Commissioner failed to determine if RPCL qualified as a firm run by professionally qualified Engineers, as directed in the remand order. RPCL argued that their technical advice required knowledgeable individuals, challenging the presumption that only Engineering firms could provide such services. The Tribunal found the Commissioner did not properly address RPCL's challenge and ruled in favor of RPCL, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and staying the recovery of the demand and penalty pending final disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32532 The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Ravi Paints & Chemicals Limited (RPCL) in a case concerning service tax for 'Consulting Engineer' services. The Commissioner failed to determine if RPCL qualified as a firm run by professionally qualified Engineers, as directed in the remand order. RPCL argued that their technical advice required knowledgeable individuals, challenging the presumption that only Engineering firms could provide such services. The Tribunal found the Commissioner did not properly address RPCL's challenge and ruled in favor of RPCL, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and staying the recovery of the demand and penalty pending final disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32532