<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 264 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for rectification of mistake regarding the service provided, determining that the original order was detailed and considered all relevant factors. The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to establish any mistakes in the original order and that accepting their arguments would amount to a review of the order rather than rectification of a clear mistake. Therefore, the application for rectification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 264 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for rectification of mistake regarding the service provided, determining that the original order was detailed and considered all relevant factors. The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to establish any mistakes in the original order and that accepting their arguments would amount to a review of the order rather than rectification of a clear mistake. Therefore, the application for rectification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>