https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436951 Benami claims require credible proof of the source of purchase money and the surrounding indicia of benami; mere conjecture about funding is insufficient to displace title standing in another's name. Applying that approach, the text states that the properties were treated as the mother's own assets, not benami purchases for the father. It also explains that settlement deeds may be invalidated where the executant's free will is doubtful and the propounder withholds the best evidence, including original deeds and key witness testimony; the deeds were therefore treated as void. Once those deeds were set aside, the plaintiff, as one of three children, was entitled to an equal one-third share in the suit properties. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436951 Benami claims require credible proof of the source of purchase money and the surrounding indicia of benami; mere conjecture about funding is insufficient to displace title standing in another's name. Applying that approach, the text states that the properties were treated as the mother's own assets, not benami purchases for the father. It also explains that settlement deeds may be invalidated where the executant's free will is doubtful and the propounder withholds the best evidence, including original deeds and key witness testimony; the deeds were therefore treated as void. Once those deeds were set aside, the plaintiff, as one of three children, was entitled to an equal one-third share in the suit properties. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436951