<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 973 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436947</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities that demanded Service Tax on royalty payments made under a &#039;Licence and Royalty Agreement&#039; for IPR services. The tribunal found that previous CESTAT decisions consistently held that such royalty payments were not subject to tax in India. Consequently, the demands by the Revenue were deemed improper, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits, if any, as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 973 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436947</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities that demanded Service Tax on royalty payments made under a &#039;Licence and Royalty Agreement&#039; for IPR services. The tribunal found that previous CESTAT decisions consistently held that such royalty payments were not subject to tax in India. Consequently, the demands by the Revenue were deemed improper, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits, if any, as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>