<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 971 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436945</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax under the goods transport agent service category. The Tribunal determined that no goods transport agent service was provided based on the absence of consignment notes and the contractual arrangements between the parties. Consequently, the appellant was not liable for the service tax, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:42:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 971 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436945</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax under the goods transport agent service category. The Tribunal determined that no goods transport agent service was provided based on the absence of consignment notes and the contractual arrangements between the parties. Consequently, the appellant was not liable for the service tax, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>