<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Will: Propounder Must Prove Validity Before Caveator Shows Undue Influence and Coercion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69404</link>
    <description>Validity of WILL - The defence set up by the respondent was that the Will was brought about by undue influence and coercion. In such cases, on the propounder discharging the initial burden required to prove the Will, the onus shifts to the Caveator to prove the allegations of undue influence and coercion. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:42:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Will: Propounder Must Prove Validity Before Caveator Shows Undue Influence and Coercion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69404</link>
      <description>Validity of WILL - The defence set up by the respondent was that the Will was brought about by undue influence and coercion. In such cases, on the propounder discharging the initial burden required to prove the Will, the onus shifts to the Caveator to prove the allegations of undue influence and coercion. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:42:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>