https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307600 The Court set aside the Assessment Orders for the years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16 due to lack of proper consideration of objections raised by the petitioner. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, directing a personal hearing for the petitioner and thorough review of objections. The Court did not express any opinion on the objections' merits, leaving it to the Assessing Officer's discretion. All three writ petitions were allowed, annulled the impugned orders, and required reevaluation within eight weeks. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:07:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307600 The Court set aside the Assessment Orders for the years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16 due to lack of proper consideration of objections raised by the petitioner. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, directing a personal hearing for the petitioner and thorough review of objections. The Court did not express any opinion on the objections' merits, leaving it to the Assessing Officer's discretion. All three writ petitions were allowed, annulled the impugned orders, and required reevaluation within eight weeks. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307600