<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307607</link>
    <description>A non-resident&#039;s receipts from independent engineering contracts were held taxable only in accordance with the applicable treaty provision for fees for technical services where no permanent establishment in India was shown. The force of attraction rule was found inapplicable because the contracts were treated as independent and the Revenue could not establish a sufficient project nexus or common link with an Indian PE. On one contract, the receipts were deleted from assessment for want of PE; on another, the income was taxed at the treaty rate rather than under section 44DA. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was also held not leviable where tax was deductible at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307607</link>
      <description>A non-resident&#039;s receipts from independent engineering contracts were held taxable only in accordance with the applicable treaty provision for fees for technical services where no permanent establishment in India was shown. The force of attraction rule was found inapplicable because the contracts were treated as independent and the Revenue could not establish a sufficient project nexus or common link with an Indian PE. On one contract, the receipts were deleted from assessment for want of PE; on another, the income was taxed at the treaty rate rather than under section 44DA. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was also held not leviable where tax was deductible at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>