<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307586</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that Shyam Behari Lal was validly adopted by Gopal Das, despite the lack of proof of the custom of adoption on the day of birth. The court relied on documentary evidence and the long-standing recognition of Shyam Behari Lal as Gopal Das&#039;s son. Debi Prasad&#039;s delay in filing the suit was deemed unjustified, and the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the adoption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307586</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that Shyam Behari Lal was validly adopted by Gopal Das, despite the lack of proof of the custom of adoption on the day of birth. The court relied on documentary evidence and the long-standing recognition of Shyam Behari Lal as Gopal Das&#039;s son. Debi Prasad&#039;s delay in filing the suit was deemed unjustified, and the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the adoption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>