<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 173 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32522</link>
    <description>A request for waiver of the balance pre-deposit in a service tax appeal was considered where the appellants had already made a substantial deposit and the exact liability required verification at the final hearing. The Bench took a prima facie view that the correct computation of tax payable could be examined in detail only at the merits stage, so the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 173 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32522</link>
      <description>A request for waiver of the balance pre-deposit in a service tax appeal was considered where the appellants had already made a substantial deposit and the exact liability required verification at the final hearing. The Bench took a prima facie view that the correct computation of tax payable could be examined in detail only at the merits stage, so the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>