https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436899 A restoration application filed after a 194-day delay was rejected because illness and alleged counsel fault did not amount to sufficient cause for condonation. The record also showed continued lack of diligence in prosecuting the matter, so discretionary restoration of the dismissed proceedings was not warranted. The appellate challenge therefore failed, and the refusal to restore the proceedings was confirmed. en-us Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Apr 2023 09:09:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436899 A restoration application filed after a 194-day delay was rejected because illness and alleged counsel fault did not amount to sufficient cause for condonation. The record also showed continued lack of diligence in prosecuting the matter, so discretionary restoration of the dismissed proceedings was not warranted. The appellate challenge therefore failed, and the refusal to restore the proceedings was confirmed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436899