<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1864 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify the segmented results and re-compute the ALP margin based on identified comparables. It upheld the use of internal RPM for trading transactions and external TNMM for manufacturing transactions, while rejecting the inclusion of pigment manufacturers as comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1864 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify the segmented results and re-compute the ALP margin based on identified comparables. It upheld the use of internal RPM for trading transactions and external TNMM for manufacturing transactions, while rejecting the inclusion of pigment manufacturers as comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>