<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AO&#039;s Assessment Flawed: Revision Upheld u/s 263 for Misjudging Land Sale Exemption Claim u/s 54B.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69370</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - nature of land sold - Even if the alternate contention of the assessee were to be accepted, then also, we observe that in the instant facts the AO has not examined the claim of the assessee for exemption u/s 54B of the Act from correct perspective. - Order of revision sustained - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:59:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:59:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>AO&#039;s Assessment Flawed: Revision Upheld u/s 263 for Misjudging Land Sale Exemption Claim u/s 54B.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69370</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - nature of land sold - Even if the alternate contention of the assessee were to be accepted, then also, we observe that in the instant facts the AO has not examined the claim of the assessee for exemption u/s 54B of the Act from correct perspective. - Order of revision sustained - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:59:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>