<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 244 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32512</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the refund of the pre-deposit amount. The department&#039;s request for a stay was denied as there is no provision for stay when the order is not enforceable against the appealing party. The impugned order favored the respondent assessee. The appeal is scheduled for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 244 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32512</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the refund of the pre-deposit amount. The department&#039;s request for a stay was denied as there is no provision for stay when the order is not enforceable against the appealing party. The impugned order favored the respondent assessee. The appeal is scheduled for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>