<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 892 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436866</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the CIT (A) NFAC for the assessment year 2017-18 under section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled that the penalty notice was void ab initio as the violation occurred in the preceding assessment year 2016-17. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:03:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 892 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436866</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the CIT (A) NFAC for the assessment year 2017-18 under section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled that the penalty notice was void ab initio as the violation occurred in the preceding assessment year 2016-17. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>