<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 369 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted conditional waiver of recovery in a service tax dispute by requiring a further pre-deposit before the balance duty and the entire penalty would remain waived. It took note of the appellant&#039;s submission on the nature of activity and the amount already deposited, and directed compliance with the pre-deposit condition within the stipulated time. Subject to that compliance, recovery of the remaining duty and penalty was stayed; failure to comply would leave the demand and penalties enforceable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 369 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted conditional waiver of recovery in a service tax dispute by requiring a further pre-deposit before the balance duty and the entire penalty would remain waived. It took note of the appellant&#039;s submission on the nature of activity and the amount already deposited, and directed compliance with the pre-deposit condition within the stipulated time. Subject to that compliance, recovery of the remaining duty and penalty was stayed; failure to comply would leave the demand and penalties enforceable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>