<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 883 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision that the assessment order was erroneous due to unverified cash deposits. The Tribunal found that the significant cash deposits were not adequately verified, rendering the assessment order flawed. Therefore, the Tribunal declined to interfere with the Principal Commissioner&#039;s directive for a fresh assessment after proper inquiry and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 883 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision that the assessment order was erroneous due to unverified cash deposits. The Tribunal found that the significant cash deposits were not adequately verified, rendering the assessment order flawed. Therefore, the Tribunal declined to interfere with the Principal Commissioner&#039;s directive for a fresh assessment after proper inquiry and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>