https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436853 The court held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit involving disputes between directors of a company, rejecting the argument that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) should have exclusive jurisdiction. The court ruled that the suit was not barred under the Companies Act, 2013, and dismissed the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court emphasized that the reliefs sought, including declaration of rights and payment of remuneration, are civil in nature and fall within the purview of the civil court. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:02:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436853 The court held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit involving disputes between directors of a company, rejecting the argument that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) should have exclusive jurisdiction. The court ruled that the suit was not barred under the Companies Act, 2013, and dismissed the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court emphasized that the reliefs sought, including declaration of rights and payment of remuneration, are civil in nature and fall within the purview of the civil court. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436853