<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 868 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the appellant, a manufacturer of PPE medicaments, for excess reversal of Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal found no intent to evade duty and noted correct credit reversal before the show cause notice. It held that there was no fraud or wilful misstatement to warrant the penalty, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:01:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 868 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the appellant, a manufacturer of PPE medicaments, for excess reversal of Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal found no intent to evade duty and noted correct credit reversal before the show cause notice. It held that there was no fraud or wilful misstatement to warrant the penalty, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>