<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1650 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all counts. It emphasized the importance of following the correct method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) and the need to consider all relevant costs as per Rule 10B. The Tribunal also reiterated the settled position on excluding service charges from total turnover for deduction under section 80HHC and the non-repetition of tax on the same amount in different years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1650 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all counts. It emphasized the importance of following the correct method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) and the need to consider all relevant costs as per Rule 10B. The Tribunal also reiterated the settled position on excluding service charges from total turnover for deduction under section 80HHC and the non-repetition of tax on the same amount in different years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>