<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1699 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307556</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the CIT (A) decision that treated the Short Term Capital Gain as bogus under Section 69A. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the AO&#039;s claims of fraudulent activity, highlighting the assessee&#039;s legitimate investment history and the genuine business operations of the companies involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1699 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307556</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the CIT (A) decision that treated the Short Term Capital Gain as bogus under Section 69A. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the AO&#039;s claims of fraudulent activity, highlighting the assessee&#039;s legitimate investment history and the genuine business operations of the companies involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>