https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307566 The court set aside the order dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, rejected the plaint, and found the suit barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, due to lack of evidence of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) or properties purchased from HUF funds. The revision petition was allowed, and the court issued the order dasti under the Court Master's signature. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:57:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307566 The court set aside the order dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, rejected the plaint, and found the suit barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, due to lack of evidence of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) or properties purchased from HUF funds. The revision petition was allowed, and the court issued the order dasti under the Court Master's signature. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307566